Journalism · Sports

Fox News proves kneeling isn’t disrespectful

The mission of the people who run Fox News, and many of the network’s high profile stars, is to broadcast commentary and pictures that will keep the the 35-40 percent of Americans who aren’t appalled by Donald Trump in a constant state of anger at the “elites.” That’s why every winter sees the resumption of the phony “War on Christmas.

Keeping viewers angry at liberals is good for business.

But sometimes, in journalism and in whatever it is we should call what they do at Fox, mistakes are made. Fox made a doozy this morning.

Fox News apologized Tuesday for a segment that implied Philadelphia Eagles players were protesting the national anthem when they were actually kneeling in prayer prior to games.

“During our report about President Trump cancelling the Philadelphia Eagles trip to the White House to celebrate their Super Bowl win, we showed unrelated footage of players kneeling in prayer,” Christopher Wallace, executive producer of “Fox News @ Night” with Shannon Bream, said in a statement.

“To clarify, no members of the team knelt in protest during the national anthem throughout regular or post-season last year. We apologize for the error,” he added.

Whoops.

You can understand how this probably happened: Fox planned stories about the President canceling the White House celebration of the Philadelphia Eagles’ Super Bowl win. (Trump knew many players, including the team’s stars, wouldn’t show up because, among other things, Trump called players who knelt in protest during the playing of the National Anthem before games “sons of bitches”).

So, to provide a visual for the White House cancels Eagles celebration story, someone grabbed video of Eagles players kneeling on the field.

De79_EeU0AIiwED

Unfortunately, the picture above was taken long before the game started and the players huddled in the end zone are praying.

Again, understandable mistake. Here are some players who actually did protest racism  by kneeling during the Anthem before games:

 

 

And here is the man who started it all, Colin Kaepernick, before he was ostracized for making a statement by kneeling.

AP_Kaepernick_160912_16x9_992

It’s impossible to tell whether the players pictured above are praying or protesting. Both activities look exactly the same, therefore it is illogical to claim the the players protesting are being disrespectful.

All the players pictured are making statements:

Some of them are unashamedly displaying their religious faith.

Some of them are displaying their belief that America, in the way too many people of color are treated, is not living up to the ideals represented by the nation’s flag.

Thanks Fox News, for making it clear that the players who want to raise awareness of racism in the United States are disrespecting no one and nothing.

They’re just being good Americans.

McBarronBlog Bonus:
Not everyone at Fox News is in the tank for Donald Trump. Shepard Smith is telling the truth every afternoon. I don’t know how he gets away with it.

Here he rakes the White House Press Secretary over the coals for her latest string of lies.

Crooks · Politics

Trump and Blago: It takes one to know one

hqdefault

He didn’t build many bridges while in office, but Rod Blagojevich sure burned a few. That’s why, aside from his devoted wife Patti, few have spoken in support for an early release for the twice-elected former Illinois Governor.

Audio tapes played at his trial showed Blagojevich believed he had something “golden” in the US Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama and he wanted to be paid for it. Conspiring to “sell” the seat, along with lying to the FBI, bought Blago 14 years in the federal pen.

The current President of the United States today initiated a discussion of whether Blago has suffered enough, while misstating the number years in the prison sentence.

“Because what he did does not justify 18 years in a jail. If you read his statement, it was a foolish statement. There was a lot of bravado … Plenty of other politicians have said a lot worse,” he said. “And it doesn’t, he shouldn’t have been put in jail.”

Fortunately, former Statehouse reporter Don Sevener recently posted to his blog a mini-refresher course on the Blagojevich years, which reminds us that much, though certainly not all, of the blame for Illinois’ current fiscal mess belongs to Blago.

The governor had a billion-dollar appetite for new spending but a budget insufficient to feed it. Unwilling to raise taxes to support his hunger, he took pension “holidays” — i.e. robbing the state’s retirement systems — to pay for populist (and sometimes popular) new programs and initiatives that the state could not afford. He wasn’t the first or only governor to use the tactic, but he was the most extravagant. 

and

In office barely two months, Blagojevich demanded higher education institutions return what amounted to a quarter of their state appropriation. He then cut higher education budgets — shortchanging students who faced higher tuition and seeding the demise of a higher education system that once ranked among the elite of the nation.

Let’s also remember that the evidence that gave Blagojevich a place of honor in the team photo of corrupt Illinois politicians included a scheme in which the CEO of Children’s Memorial Hospital saw $8 million in promised state health care funding withheld from his facility.

Mr. Blagojevich on Oct. 8 discussed with one of his campaign fundraisers pressing the executive — named in the criminal complaint as “Hospital Executive 1” — for a $50,000 campaign contribution, allegedly a quid pro quo for the governor’s recent funding commitment, according to the affidavit.

“I’m going to do $8 million for them. I want to get (Hospital Executive 1) for 50,” Mr. Blagojevich told the fundraiser, according to the 78-page affidavit.

Mr. Blagojevich had a conversation with a deputy governor about the status of the funding, as described in the affidavit: “The pediatric doctors — the reimbursement. Has that gone out yet, or is that still on hold?” Mr. Blagojevich asked.

“It’s January 1,” a deputy governor responded.

“And we have total discretion over it?” he asked.

“Yep,” a deputy governor replied.

“We could pull it back if we need to – budgetary concerns – right?”

A deputy replied “yep,” to which the governor said: “That’s good to know,” according to the affidavit.

Again, we’re talking about a hospital that treats sick children. They never did get the money.

Why would this President consider a pardon commuting the sentence for a not too bright, but extremely greedy, selfish jerk, lacking any principles, who screwed over the people who put him in office and cared only about himself and his immediate family?

Let’s just say Donald Trump understands Rod Blagojevich.

Should he decide to spring the former governor, perhaps the President could help Blagojevich get back on his feet by giving him a job in his administration.

As bad as he is, Blagojevich has more experience in government than most Trump cabinet members.

And as for the moral impact on this Administration, it’s a wash.

# # #

McBarronBlog Bonus Links

CapitolFax: Blagojevich again attempts to rewrite history

Life, in particular: Throw Away the Key

VIDEO: A man who never takes responsibility tries to get Rod Blagojevich to take responsibility.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guns · Uncategorized

Ignore the defeatists: Gun violence is a solvable problem

Screenshot 2018-05-19 08.10.26

Fifty-seven years ago this week, the President of the United States stood before a joint session of Congress and said something nutty.

First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth. 

John F. Kennedy elaborated on that thought a few months later before a big crowd in a Houston football stadium.

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win…

In 1961, no doubt some considered that goal to be “crazy talk.”

As of July 20, 1969, it was reality.

I found myself thinking about JFK and his outlandish commitment to the space program when I read a characterization of Friday’s Santa Fe, Texas, shooting as part of an “epidemic without a solution.”

That’s defeatist talk. Defeatism has never solved a problem.

America’s gun problem

The US is unique in two key — and related — ways when it comes to guns: It has way more gun deaths than other developed nations, and it has far higher levels of gun ownership than any other country in the world.

The US has nearly six times the gun homicide rate of Canada, more than seven times that of Sweden, and nearly 16 times that of Germany, according to United Nations data compiled by the Guardian. (These gun deaths are a big reason America has a much higher overall homicide rate, which includes non-gun deaths, than other developed nations.)

Researcher Josh Tewksbury’s data show the correlation between the number of guns and gun deaths (including homicides and suicides) among wealthier nations:

GUN_SCATTERPLOT_2x

 

If this was an epidemic without a solution, the United States would not be an outlier.

As journalist German Lopez reports in VOX.com:

Guns are not the only contributor to violence. (Other factors include, for example, poverty, urbanization, and alcohol consumption.) But when researchers control for other confounding variables, they have found time and time again that America’s high levels of gun ownership are a major reason the US is so much worse in terms of gun violence than its developed peers.

The moon shot happened because fulfilling President Kennedy’s promise became a priority for the nation and a goal members of  Congress supported, for which they approved resources. It unified the country.

Leadership on the gun issue could have the same effect. There’s already plenty of support which, in a democracy, ought to count for something.

Gallup:

Americans’ support for tougher gun laws hit a 25-year high in March. In the wake of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, in a March Gallup poll, 67% of Americans indicated their support for tougher restrictions on guns. This was the highest level of support for more stringent gun laws in the U.S. since 1993. Americans’ support for tougher gun laws has generally trended up since the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, and has now returned to levels last seen prior to 2000.

HighestStricterLaws
What we lack are leaders who aspire to do the difficult. You won’t get that kind of leadership from this White House, but we can move the fight in the right direction this November.
Pay attention to the congressional elections.
If gun violence matters to you, find out which members of Congress accept NRA support and support their opponents. Encourage friends and family to do the same.
Instead of letting the defeatists get us off track, let’s pay attention to the what the young people, those literally on the front lines of gun violence, have to say about the attitude that has kept rational gun laws from becoming law.
Screenshot 2018-05-19 12.20.36

“When we’ve had our say with the government — and maybe the adults have gotten used to saying ‘it is what it is,’ but if us students have learned anything, it’s that if you don’t study, you will fail,” declared Emma Gonzalez, a Parkland student, in a speech that has gone viral on the Internet.

“And in this case if you actively do nothing, people continually end up dead, so it’s time to start doing something.

Ignore the defeatists.

Americans can accomplish anything if we are committed to victory, no matter how long it takes.

We put a man on the moon, for God’s sake.

Journalism · Uncategorized

Save the Sun-Times

Thirty years ago, the Chicago White Sox announced plans to move to Florida. Governor Jim Thompson knew the loss would diminish the city’s stature.

He also realized he would be held responsible if the Sox left. In June, 1988, with assistance from Speaker Michael Madigan, “Big Jim” twisted enough legislator’s arms to keep the White Sox on the south side.

The point: Keeping Chicago as one of two cites (with New York) with two big league teams was/is a big deal and was worth fighting for.

You know what else is a big deal and worth fighting for?

Having two high-quality daily newspapers.

Yesterday’s Tweet from a reporter at the Sacramento (CA) Bee is a reminder of the state of the newspaper industry.

In Chicago, significant numbers of reporters and editors at both the Tribune and the Sun-Times have been dismissed in recent years.

Five years ago, due to economic pressures (and bad management), the Sun-Times fired all of its photographers, though a few were later rehired. The paper itself has many fewer reporters than it did a decade ago.

But the Sun-Times, with new management, is still here and fighting for survival.

At the Tribune, a much bigger paper, the exit door has been seeing a lot of activity in  recent years, with the latest exodus occurring last month.

It marked the second round of layoffs in five months under publisher and editor-in-chief Bruce Dold. In October Dold cited “significant financial pressure” facing the news industry in cutting a reported 14 positions.

A financially healthy Sun-Times will help protect the Tribune as well. Tribune reporters have decided to form a union to protect the newsroom from the paper’s management. That management, unsurprisingly, has decided to fight the union organizing effort.

Without competition, the Tribune will have no incentive to make peace with the union or to stop diverting newspaper revenues from the newsroom to executives. Saving the Sun-Times means TWO quality papers for Chicago.

We need to save journalism by paying for it.

Two papers staffed with reporters committed to the public’s right to know, who keep each other honest while informing the rest of us, help protect our democracy from those who would prefer we remain clueless.

While a number of individuals or organizations fit that description, no matter who you are or who you do/don’t trust, the point is the same: We need reporters who will ferret out the truth and deliver it to us.

Good journalism has value and must be paid for, so please subscribe.

If past editorial positions are keeping you from subscribing, please reconsider.

The Sun-Times is under new management, including support from organized labor. This  coincides with a new trend of publishing editorials supportive of working people.

Don’t be the person who helped kill democracy by allowing journalism to die. Support your local paper and consider supporting the Sun-Times. Choose home delivery or online access, but please subscribe NOW.

Below are links to the top ten (by circulation) newspapers in Illinois. You can google your area’s paper, if you don’t see it.

As another paper likes to say, “Democracy Dies in Darkness.”

Let’s keep the lights on.

1.   Chicago Tribune

2.Chicago Sun-Times

3.   Hoy

4.   Journal Star

5.   Daily Herald – Cook County

6.   Belleville News-Democrat

7.   The State Journal-Register

8.   Rockford Register Star

9.   Dispatch/Argus

10. The Pantagraph

McBarronBlog Bonus:

Imagine Chicago without the Sun-Times

meeting the famous · Radio

Meeting Mrs. Bush

As her husband, George H. W. Bush, campaigned in 1988 to replace President Ronald Reagan, “Second Lady,” Barbara Bush, came to Springfield.

Mrs. Bush’s passion was promoting literacy. She visited public schools often, unlike the current White House occupant and his Secretary of Education.

As the wife of the vice president, and later as First Lady, Mrs. Bush was very well-respected. She also was feared. As a 1992 Vanity Fair profile stated,

People who have worked with the Bushes use words and phrases like “difficult” … “tough as nails” … “demanding” … “autocratic.” A 1988-campaign staffer recalls that “when she frowned it had the capacity to send shudders through a lot of people.”

In the presence of school children though, her soft side came through.

5fd418db892c805eb6cdcc4fe19edb44

My memory is a little fuzzy 30 years later, but I assume her plan when she visited Springfield in mid-1988 was to promote literacy, visit some schools, get some nice pictures in the paper.

Somehow, that plan went slightly awry. I was the news director for a local radio station. As a matter of course, whenever newsmakers came to town, as they often did in election years, I would request a one-on-one interview. Being a lowly radio guy, I didn’t often get the big ones.

As I recall, Mrs. Bush’s visit was being coordinated by the governor’s office. Again, the details are blurred, but someone made a mistake.

My request was approved.

My belief that it was a mistake is based on Mrs. Bush’s deportment when I met her, and her attendant, in a small office at the Statehouse.

She appeared to be pissed at someone, though, thankfully, not at me.

She sat for the interview and answered all my questions. She was not unpleasant. She was direct, not chatty. There were no laughs.

Three decades later, I have no recollection of the details of what we discussed. It’s safe to assume no big news was made. In fact, I might not have remembered the conversation at all if it was not for one odd thing about it.

It’s common for prominent people making public appearances to have attendants, people who make sure meetings with the media go well and don’t get weird. It wasn’t unusual that the person who accompanied Mrs. Bush sat in a chair just to my right as I interviewed her. What was unusual was who that person was.

An arm’s-length from me, for the duration of the conversation, was Gov. James Thompson.

The governor, mid-way though the last of his four terms, said nothing during the interview which, I imagine, lasted 20 or 30 minutes.

He just sat there.

Afterward I tried to figure out why.  Theory: It was his punishment for having someone in his office approve my interview request.

I know this: There was only on person in that room happy about my interview and it wasn’t either of them.

Anyway, the interview concluded without incident. We went our separate ways.

I guess the only other thing worth mentioning is that, in November of 1988, George H. W. Bush won Illinois’ electoral votes with 50.7 percent of the vote, topping Michael Dukakis by 1.8 percentage points. Barbara Bush’s time in Illinois could only have contributed to that success.

Barbara Bush was always an asset to her husband’s political career. She didn’t suffer fools.

I’m grateful that, one day at the Illinois Statehouse, she made an exception.

# # #

 

 

Guns

In praise of the “PR stunt”

IMG_1811

Retirement means I’ve been able to visit places with the family I never thought I would see. Earlier this year, we journeyed to Paris and Amsterdam, experiencing The Louvre, Napoleon’s Tomb, the Anne Frank House and much more.

In Amsterdam, we stayed in a hotel with a link to Beatles history.

IMG_1795

The Amsterdam Hilton opened in 1962, but its greatest fame came seven years later when the presidential suite, room #702, became the honeymoon suite for newlyweds John Lennon and Yoko Ono.

From March 25-31, 1969, Lennon and Ono hosted media members from around the world at their “Bed-in for peace.” The idea was to use their highly publicized marriage to bring attention to the importance of ending the Vietnam war.

With their nonconformist artistic expressions (cf. Bari: 33),[3] such as the nude cover of the Two Virgins album, the press were expecting them to be having sex, but instead the couple were just sitting in bed, wearing pyjamas—in John’s words “like angels”—talking about peace with signs over their bed reading “Hair Peace” and “Bed Peace”. After seven days, they flew to Vienna, Austria, where they held a Bagism press conference.

The Bed-in was a PR stun intended to draw attention to the couple’s pro-peace message. As such, it was quite successful. The Bed-in for Peace received a huge amount of news coverage worldwide. The North American leg of the Bed-in (Montreal, June, 1969) was the site for the recording of Lennon’s peace anthem which was an international hit.

Whether one considered it silly or serious, the Bed-in drew attention. It irritated President Nixon whose infamous “enemies list” included Lennon, an outspoken and extremely famous anti-war activist.

This morning, I watched a news report on the anniversary of the “Bed-in.” The report noted “the PR stunt didn’t end the war.”

Well, no. The war didn’t end, this week, 49 years ago.

Neither did the mass anti-war demonstrations that took place throughout the 60s end the war. At least, not during the 1960s. Those also could have been described as “PR stunts.”

A stunt is an event designed to draw attention. An anti-war PR stunt is intended to get the attention of people who don’t usually consider the cost of war. It raises the question, “Is it worth it?”

Small demonstrations, like the Bed-in, and large, like the December 1969 March on Washington, helped shorten the war. Over time, those on the fence examined their attitudes and decided the war wasn’t worth the cost. Moving people to the “it’s not worth it” position ended the war.

Saturday’s demonstrations against gun violence haven’t ended end gun violence.

Yet.

But, there was palpable energy and commitment emanating from the huge crowds of young people participating in the March for Our Lives events throughout the country on Saturday, including those in Washington D.C.Springfield, Chicago, and its surrounding areas. That’s what a movement looks like.

If you show up in large numbers to promote a powerful message and, if you’re in for the long haul, you will eventually win. That’s what we learned from the anti-war movement and from the civil rights movement.

march-for-our-lives-washington-15-gty-er-180324_hpMain_4x3_992

signs

It’s not hard to imagine John Lennon would have been marching against gun violence in New York on Sunday. Others of his generation marched in his place.

pm

Battles aren’t won by PR stunts, but when stunts are part of a strategy and supported by highly motivated people dedicated to a cause, they can help achieve goals worth fighting for.

IMG_1797
Photo hanging in the lobby of the Amsterdam Hilton

McBarronBlog Bonus

The Amsterdam Hilton is name checked on this Beatles single which features Lennon on guitar and McCartney on all the other instruments. Ballad of John and Yoko

Guns · Privilege

Privilege? You be the judge

get-out-of-jail-free-card

The facts:

A 67-year old man fired a pistol in his apartment. The bullet passed through the wall he shared with his neighbor.

The shooter failed to report the accident. In addition, when asked by his neighbor and the property management company AND the police about the hole in the wall, he provided various explanations, none of which mentioned a firearm.

Police reports say O’Shea gave property managers and police at least three excuses for the hole, including he accidentally put a screwdriver through the wall while hanging a mirror, and his son accidentally caused the hole while using a pneumatic nail gun.

Nine days after the shooting, the neighbor ran across a spent bullet in his apartment. Only then did the shooter admit what had happened. He was charged with reckless conduct.

Now, you might think this an “open and shut” case. If you’re familiar with the legal system, you might be surprised there was a trial. Most lawyers would tell someone stupid enough to fire a gun in his house, and foolish enough to lie to police about it, to avoid court.

But the shooter knew plenty about the legal system.

DuPage County Judge Patrick O’Shea was negligent when he accidentally fired a revolver through his wall and into a neighbor’s apartment, but a Kane County judge ruled Friday those actions did not meet reckless conduct requirements.

Judge Keith Johnson found O’Shea not guilty, ruling prosecutors failed to prove key components of the charge.

The state did not prove anyone’s life was in danger because prosecutors were unable to prove anyone was home in the unit where the shot was fired or anywhere else in the vicinity, Johnson said.

The phrase “white privilege” rubs many people, particularly white people, the wrong way. This is understandable. After all, life is hard for everyone. Few are spared hardship and disappointment.

On the other hand, who believes the court would have been so understanding about the shooting and lying had it been, for example, a young black man who fired a gun into another person’s DuPage County apartment?

Anyone?

Bueller?

The not guilty verdict  wasn’t the end of the good news Judge Johnson gave Judge O’Shea:

He also signed an order allowing to O’Shea to retrieve two pistols and 49 other guns from the Wheaton Police Department, once his FOID card is reinstated by the Illinois State Police.

Oh good. I was afraid a dope wouldn’t have access to 51 guns.

O’Shea declined to comment. His attorney, Terry Ekl, said they expected and were pleased with the ruling.

Yes, despite the evidence, the confession and the lying,  the ruling was “expected.”

I have no reason to believe, after the verdict was issued, that Judge O’Shea told Judge Johnson “It’s been a privilege.”

But he should have.

# # #